CAMS-KR 문제 136
테러 자금 조달 방지(CFT)
역사적으로 실질적 소유권을 숨기는 데 가장 자주 사용된 수단은 무엇입니까?
역사적으로 실질적 소유권을 숨기는 데 가장 자주 사용된 수단은 무엇입니까?
정답: B
a vehicle that is historically most often used to hide beneficial ownership, which is an offshore company. An offshore company is a legal entity that is incorporated or registered in a foreign jurisdiction, usually with low or no taxes, high confidentiality, and lax regulation. Offshore companies can be used by money launderers and other criminals to conceal the true identity and ownership of the funds or assets that they control, andto evade taxes, reporting, or legal obligations in their home jurisdictions. Offshore companies can also be layered with other vehicles, such as trusts, foundations, or nominees, to create complex and opaque structures that make it difficult for authorities to trace the source and destination of illicit funds.
The other options are not necessarily vehicles that are most often used to hide beneficial ownership, although they may pose some risks or challenges depending on the circumstances and the risk profile of the customers and countries involved. Option A describes a professional association, which is a group of individuals or entities that share a common profession or interest, such as lawyers, accountants, or doctors. Professional associations may be involved in money laundering or terrorist financing as facilitators, intermediaries, or advisors, but they are not typically used to hide beneficial ownership. Option C describes a limited liability partnership, which is a legal entity that combines the features of a partnership and a corporation, and limits the liability of its partners. Limited liability partnerships may be used by money launderers or terrorist financiers to obscure the ownership or control of funds or assets, but they are not as common or as secretive as offshore companies. Option D describes a charitable organization, which is a non-profit entity that is established for a charitable, religious, educational, or other public benefit purpose. Charitable organizations may be abused by money launderers or terrorist financiers to divert funds or assets for illicit purposes, but they are not usually used to hide beneficial ownership.
ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course - 6th Edition1
Exam CAMS: Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition)2 ACAMS CAMS Study Guide - 6th Edition, Chapter 4, pages 86-87
https://www.acams.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ACAMS-CAMS-Study-Guide-6th-Edition-Chapter-4.pdf
The other options are not necessarily vehicles that are most often used to hide beneficial ownership, although they may pose some risks or challenges depending on the circumstances and the risk profile of the customers and countries involved. Option A describes a professional association, which is a group of individuals or entities that share a common profession or interest, such as lawyers, accountants, or doctors. Professional associations may be involved in money laundering or terrorist financing as facilitators, intermediaries, or advisors, but they are not typically used to hide beneficial ownership. Option C describes a limited liability partnership, which is a legal entity that combines the features of a partnership and a corporation, and limits the liability of its partners. Limited liability partnerships may be used by money launderers or terrorist financiers to obscure the ownership or control of funds or assets, but they are not as common or as secretive as offshore companies. Option D describes a charitable organization, which is a non-profit entity that is established for a charitable, religious, educational, or other public benefit purpose. Charitable organizations may be abused by money launderers or terrorist financiers to divert funds or assets for illicit purposes, but they are not usually used to hide beneficial ownership.
ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course - 6th Edition1
Exam CAMS: Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition)2 ACAMS CAMS Study Guide - 6th Edition, Chapter 4, pages 86-87
https://www.acams.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ACAMS-CAMS-Study-Guide-6th-Edition-Chapter-4.pdf
CAMS-KR 문제 137
어떤 보험 상품이 자금 세탁에 특히 취약합니까?
정답: A
According to the ACAMS study guide, one of the insurance products that is particularly vulnerable to money laundering is annuity, which is "a contract that provides a series of payments over a specified period of time, usually for the life of the annuitant" (p. 223). Annuities can be used by money launderers to deposit large sums of illicit funds in a single transaction, or to receive regular payments from a legitimate source after paying the premiums with dirty money. Annuities can also be surrendered or transferred to third parties, making it difficult to trace the origin and destination of funds.
ACAMS. (2020). Study Guide for the Certification Examination for Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (6th ed.). Miami, FL: ACAMS.
ComplyAdvantage. (2023)AML in Insurance: How to Detect & Combat Money Laundering 1. Retrieved from
https://complyadvantage.com
Financial Crime Academy. (2023)Anti Money Laundering (AML) In Insurance Industry In 2021 2. Retrieved from https://financialcrimeacademy.org
ACAMS. (2020). Study Guide for the Certification Examination for Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (6th ed.). Miami, FL: ACAMS.
ComplyAdvantage. (2023)AML in Insurance: How to Detect & Combat Money Laundering 1. Retrieved from
https://complyadvantage.com
Financial Crime Academy. (2023)Anti Money Laundering (AML) In Insurance Industry In 2021 2. Retrieved from https://financialcrimeacademy.org
CAMS-KR 문제 138
금융 기관(FI)이 의심스러운 자금 세탁 활동을 식별하기 위해 사용하는 가장 일반적인 두 가지 통제 수단은 무엇입니까? (2개를 선택하세요.)
정답: A,E
Sanctions screening and transaction monitoring rules are two of the most common controls that FIs use to identify suspicious money-laundering activity. Sanctions screening is the process of checking customers, transactions, and counterparties against various lists of sanctioned individuals, entities, and countries issued by national and international authorities. Sanctions screening helps FIs to avoid doing business with or facilitating the activities of those who are involved in terrorism, proliferation, human rights violations, or other criminal activities. Transaction monitoring rules are the criteria or scenarios that FIs use to detect unusual or potentially suspicious patterns of transactions or behaviors of customers or accounts. Transaction monitoring rules help FIs to identify transactions that deviate from the expected norms, such as large cash deposits, frequent wire transfers, or transactions with high-risk jurisdictions. Transaction monitoring rules also help FIs to comply with their reporting obligations, such as filing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) or Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs).
= ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course, Chapter 4: Developing an Effective Anti-Money Laundering Program, Section 4.2: Customer Identification Program (CIP) and Customer Due Diligence (CDD); Money laundering and terrorist financing, Section: Anti Money Laundering (AML) regulations; The Three Stages Of Money Laundering And How Money Laundering Works, Section: How to Prevent Money Laundering.
= ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course, Chapter 4: Developing an Effective Anti-Money Laundering Program, Section 4.2: Customer Identification Program (CIP) and Customer Due Diligence (CDD); Money laundering and terrorist financing, Section: Anti Money Laundering (AML) regulations; The Three Stages Of Money Laundering And How Money Laundering Works, Section: How to Prevent Money Laundering.
CAMS-KR 문제 139
테러 자금 조달(CFT)
FIU가 다른 FIU에 유용할 수 있는 정보를 가지고 있을 때 어떤 조치를 고려해야 할까요?
FIU가 다른 FIU에 유용할 수 있는 정보를 가지고 있을 때 어떤 조치를 고려해야 할까요?
정답: B
According to the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units, which is a network of over 160 FIUs that promotes international cooperation and information exchange, FIUs should share information with foreign FIUs spontaneously, without prior request, when they have reasonable grounds to believe that the information is relevant for the receiving FIU1. This principle is also reflected in the FATF Recommendation 40, which states that FIUs should exchange information with other FIUs, especially when this information concerns money laundering, predicate offences, or terrorist financing2. Spontaneous information sharing can enhance the effectiveness of FIUs, as it can help to identify new leads, trends, patterns, or typologies, as well as to prevent or disrupt criminal activities1.
The other options are not consistent with the best practices of FIU information sharing. For example:
In accordance with Wolfsberg guidelines, submit the information to the other FIU in written form. The Wolfsberg Group is an association of 13 global banks that issues guidance and standards on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing. However, the Wolfsberg guidelines are not binding for FIUs, and they do not specify the format or channel of informationexchange between FIUs3. Moreover, submitting information in written form may not be the most efficient or secure way of communication, as it may cause delays, errors, or breaches of confidentiality.
Take no action until contacted by the other FIU. This option contradicts the principle of spontaneous information sharing, as it implies that the FIU with the relevant information will wait for a formal request from the other FIU, instead of proactively sharing the information. This may result in missed opportunities, inefficiencies, or failures in detecting or preventing money laundering or terrorist financing.
Request approval from the Egmont Group prior to sharing the information with the other FIU. This option is unnecessary and impractical, as the Egmont Group does not have the authority or the capacity to approve or deny individual information requests or exchanges between FIUs. The Egmont Group provides a platform and a framework for FIU cooperation, but it does not interfere with the operational autonomy or the bilateral relations of its members4.
FATF Recommendation 40: Other Forms of International Co-operation
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Principles for Information Exchange Between Financial Intelligence Units Wolfsberg Group Egmont Group
The other options are not consistent with the best practices of FIU information sharing. For example:
In accordance with Wolfsberg guidelines, submit the information to the other FIU in written form. The Wolfsberg Group is an association of 13 global banks that issues guidance and standards on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing. However, the Wolfsberg guidelines are not binding for FIUs, and they do not specify the format or channel of informationexchange between FIUs3. Moreover, submitting information in written form may not be the most efficient or secure way of communication, as it may cause delays, errors, or breaches of confidentiality.
Take no action until contacted by the other FIU. This option contradicts the principle of spontaneous information sharing, as it implies that the FIU with the relevant information will wait for a formal request from the other FIU, instead of proactively sharing the information. This may result in missed opportunities, inefficiencies, or failures in detecting or preventing money laundering or terrorist financing.
Request approval from the Egmont Group prior to sharing the information with the other FIU. This option is unnecessary and impractical, as the Egmont Group does not have the authority or the capacity to approve or deny individual information requests or exchanges between FIUs. The Egmont Group provides a platform and a framework for FIU cooperation, but it does not interfere with the operational autonomy or the bilateral relations of its members4.
FATF Recommendation 40: Other Forms of International Co-operation
Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units Principles for Information Exchange Between Financial Intelligence Units Wolfsberg Group Egmont Group
CAMS-KR 문제 140
카지노와 관련된 위험 기반 접근 방식을 구현할 때 개인으로서 고객과 관련된 위험은 무엇입니까? (2개를 선택하세요.)
정답: B,D
When implementing a risk-based approach related to casinos, the risks related to the customer as an individual are mainly based on the customer's profile, behaviour, source of funds, and geographic location. Among the options given, B and D are the most relevant factors that could indicate a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Casual customers are those who do not have a regular or established relationship with the casino, and who may visit the casino only once or occasionally. They may not provide sufficient or reliable identification information, or may use false or stolen identities. They may also engage in suspicious transactions, such as large cash purchases of chips, minimal or no gaming activity, or frequent transfers of chips between customers. Casual customers pose a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing because they are harder to verify, monitor, and trace by the casino operators.
Customer from a high-risk country is a customer who resides in, or has links to, a country that is subject to sanctions, embargoes, or similar measures, or that is identified by credible sources as having significant levels of corruption, or as being a source, transit, or destination of illicit funds. Such customers pose a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing because they may be involved in, or connected to, criminal or terrorist activities, or may be using funds that are derived from or intended for such activities.
= The main reference for this question is the document titled "FATF Guidance on the Risk-Based Approach for Casinos" published by the FATF in October 2008. You can access it by clicking here. You can also find more information about the risk-based approach and the customer risks for casinos on the Gambling Commission website and the Exam Answer website.
Casual customers are those who do not have a regular or established relationship with the casino, and who may visit the casino only once or occasionally. They may not provide sufficient or reliable identification information, or may use false or stolen identities. They may also engage in suspicious transactions, such as large cash purchases of chips, minimal or no gaming activity, or frequent transfers of chips between customers. Casual customers pose a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing because they are harder to verify, monitor, and trace by the casino operators.
Customer from a high-risk country is a customer who resides in, or has links to, a country that is subject to sanctions, embargoes, or similar measures, or that is identified by credible sources as having significant levels of corruption, or as being a source, transit, or destination of illicit funds. Such customers pose a higher risk of money laundering or terrorist financing because they may be involved in, or connected to, criminal or terrorist activities, or may be using funds that are derived from or intended for such activities.
= The main reference for this question is the document titled "FATF Guidance on the Risk-Based Approach for Casinos" published by the FATF in October 2008. You can access it by clicking here. You can also find more information about the risk-based approach and the customer risks for casinos on the Gambling Commission website and the Exam Answer website.
- 다른 버전
- 1141ACAMS.CAMS-KR.v2026-03-09.q377
- 591ACAMS.CAMS-KR.v2026-03-04.q104
- 1362ACAMS.CAMS-KR.v2025-11-24.q402
- 2234ACAMS.CAMS-KR.v2025-03-03.q354
- 1527ACAMS.CAMS-KR.v2024-02-24.q277
- 1580ACAMS.CAMS-KR.v2023-06-05.q235
- 최근 업로드
- 110Snowflake.ADA-C02.v2026-06-08.q23
- 127Microsoft.SC-300-KR.v2026-06-08.q173
- 112Microsoft.DP-300-KR.v2026-06-08.q157
- 118Microsoft.MS-102-KR.v2026-06-08.q240
- 113Microsoft.DP-300-KR.v2026-06-08.q176
- 119Microsoft.SC-100-KR.v2026-06-08.q115
- 121TheBerylInstitute.CPXP.v2026-06-06.q56
- 190ACAMS.CAMS7-KR.v2026-06-05.q213
- 181PaloAltoNetworks.XSIAM-Analyst.v2026-06-04.q72
- 159NLN.NEX.v2026-06-04.q54
[×]
PDF 파일 다운로드
메일 주소를 입력하시고 다운로드 하세요. ACAMS.CAMS-KR.v2026-03-13.q399 모의시험 시험자료를 다운 받으세요.