CISA-KR 문제 116
다음 중 EUC(최종 사용자 컴퓨팅)에서 생성된 보고서에 의존할 때 가장 큰 위험은 무엇입니까?
정답: A
Explanation
End-user computing (EUC) is a system in which users are able to create working applications besides the divided development process of design, build, test and release that is typically followed by software engineers1. Examples of EUC tools include spreadsheets, databases, low-code/no-code platforms, and generative AI applications2. EUC tools can provide flexibility, efficiency, and innovation for the users, but they also pose significant risks if not properly managed and controlled3.
The greatest risk when relying on reports generated by EUC is that the data may be inaccurate. Data accuracy refers to the extent to which the data in the reports reflect the true values of the underlying information4.
Inaccurate data can lead to erroneous decisions, misleading analysis, unreliable reporting, and compliance violations. Some of the factors that can cause data inaccuracy in EUC reports are:
Lack of rigorous testing: EUC tools may not undergo the same level of testing and validation as IT-developed applications, which can result in errors, bugs, or inconsistencies in the data processing and output3.
Lack of version and change control: EUC tools may not have a clear record of the changes made to them over time, which can create confusion, duplication, or loss of data. Users may also modify or overwrite the data without proper authorization or documentation3.
Lack of documentation and reliance on end-user who developed it: EUC tools may not have sufficient documentation to explain their purpose, functionality, assumptions, limitations, and dependencies. Users may also rely on the knowledge and expertise of the original developer, who may not be available or may not have followed best practices3.
Lack of maintenance processes: EUC tools may not have regular updates, backups, or reviews to ensure their functionality and security. Users may also neglect to delete or archive obsolete or redundant data3.
Lack of security: EUC tools may not have adequate access controls, encryption, or authentication mechanisms to protect the data from unauthorized access, modification, or disclosure. Users may also store or share the data in insecure locations or devices3.
Lack of audit trail: EUC tools may not have a traceable history of the data sources, inputs, outputs, calculations, and transformations. Users may also manipulate or falsify the data without detection or accountability3.
Overreliance on manual controls: EUC tools may depend on human intervention to input, verify, or correct the data, which can introduce errors, delays, or biases. Users may also lack the skills or training to use the EUC tools effectively and efficiently3.
The other options are not as great as data inaccuracy when relying on EUC reports. Reports may not work efficiently, reports may not be timely, and historical data may not be available are all potential risks associated with EUC tools, but they are less severe and less frequent than data inaccuracy. Moreover, these risks can be mitigated by improving the performance, scheduling, and storage of the EUC tools. However, data inaccuracy can have a pervasive and lasting impact on the quality and credibility of the reports and the decisions based on them. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.
References:
What is Data Accuracy?
What Is End User Computing (EUC) Risk?
End-user computing
End-User Computing (EUC) Risks: A Comprehensive Guide
End-user computing (EUC) is a system in which users are able to create working applications besides the divided development process of design, build, test and release that is typically followed by software engineers1. Examples of EUC tools include spreadsheets, databases, low-code/no-code platforms, and generative AI applications2. EUC tools can provide flexibility, efficiency, and innovation for the users, but they also pose significant risks if not properly managed and controlled3.
The greatest risk when relying on reports generated by EUC is that the data may be inaccurate. Data accuracy refers to the extent to which the data in the reports reflect the true values of the underlying information4.
Inaccurate data can lead to erroneous decisions, misleading analysis, unreliable reporting, and compliance violations. Some of the factors that can cause data inaccuracy in EUC reports are:
Lack of rigorous testing: EUC tools may not undergo the same level of testing and validation as IT-developed applications, which can result in errors, bugs, or inconsistencies in the data processing and output3.
Lack of version and change control: EUC tools may not have a clear record of the changes made to them over time, which can create confusion, duplication, or loss of data. Users may also modify or overwrite the data without proper authorization or documentation3.
Lack of documentation and reliance on end-user who developed it: EUC tools may not have sufficient documentation to explain their purpose, functionality, assumptions, limitations, and dependencies. Users may also rely on the knowledge and expertise of the original developer, who may not be available or may not have followed best practices3.
Lack of maintenance processes: EUC tools may not have regular updates, backups, or reviews to ensure their functionality and security. Users may also neglect to delete or archive obsolete or redundant data3.
Lack of security: EUC tools may not have adequate access controls, encryption, or authentication mechanisms to protect the data from unauthorized access, modification, or disclosure. Users may also store or share the data in insecure locations or devices3.
Lack of audit trail: EUC tools may not have a traceable history of the data sources, inputs, outputs, calculations, and transformations. Users may also manipulate or falsify the data without detection or accountability3.
Overreliance on manual controls: EUC tools may depend on human intervention to input, verify, or correct the data, which can introduce errors, delays, or biases. Users may also lack the skills or training to use the EUC tools effectively and efficiently3.
The other options are not as great as data inaccuracy when relying on EUC reports. Reports may not work efficiently, reports may not be timely, and historical data may not be available are all potential risks associated with EUC tools, but they are less severe and less frequent than data inaccuracy. Moreover, these risks can be mitigated by improving the performance, scheduling, and storage of the EUC tools. However, data inaccuracy can have a pervasive and lasting impact on the quality and credibility of the reports and the decisions based on them. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.
References:
What is Data Accuracy?
What Is End User Computing (EUC) Risk?
End-user computing
End-User Computing (EUC) Risks: A Comprehensive Guide
CISA-KR 문제 117
다음 중 유효한 숫자 부품 번호 입력에 대한 가장 효과적인 정확도 제어는 무엇입니까?
정답: D
Explanation
A self-checking digit is the most effective accuracy control for entry of a valid numeric part number. This method involves adding an extra digit at the end of every number which is calculated from the other digits. This digit is then used to check the accuracy of the entered number1. While hash totals, online review of description, and comparison to historical order pattern can be used as accuracy controls, they are not as effective as a self-checking digit.
A self-checking digit is the most effective accuracy control for entry of a valid numeric part number. This method involves adding an extra digit at the end of every number which is calculated from the other digits. This digit is then used to check the accuracy of the entered number1. While hash totals, online review of description, and comparison to historical order pattern can be used as accuracy controls, they are not as effective as a self-checking digit.
CISA-KR 문제 118
다음 중 조직의 재해 복구 계획(DRP)에 대한 복구 시간 목표(RTO)를 충족하는 접근 방식은 무엇입니까?
정답: B
Explanation
A full interruption test is the most realistic and reliable way to ensure that recovery time objectives (RTOs) are met for an organization's disaster recovery plan (DRP). RTOs are the maximum amount of time that a business can tolerate being offline after a disaster. A full interruption test involves shutting down the primary site and switching over to the backup site, simulating a real disaster scenario. This test can measure the actual time it takes to restore the systems, applications, and functions that are critical for the business continuity. A full interruption test can also reveal any issues or gaps in the DRP that might affect the recovery process.
The other options are not as effective as a full interruption test for ensuring RTOs are met. A cyber resilience test is a type of DR test that focuses on the ability to withstand and recover from cyberattacks. It does not necessarily cover other types of disasters or test the entire DRP. A tabletop test is a low-impact DR test that involves a walkthrough of the DRP with the key stakeholders and staff. It does not involve any actual switching over or testing of the backup systems. A parallel test is a type of DR test that involves running the backup systems alongside the primary systems, without disrupting the normal operations. It does not measure the time it takes to switch over or resume operations at the backup site.
References:
Best Practices For Disaster Recovery Testing
Disaster recovery testing
Disaster Recovery Testing: Everything to Know
A full interruption test is the most realistic and reliable way to ensure that recovery time objectives (RTOs) are met for an organization's disaster recovery plan (DRP). RTOs are the maximum amount of time that a business can tolerate being offline after a disaster. A full interruption test involves shutting down the primary site and switching over to the backup site, simulating a real disaster scenario. This test can measure the actual time it takes to restore the systems, applications, and functions that are critical for the business continuity. A full interruption test can also reveal any issues or gaps in the DRP that might affect the recovery process.
The other options are not as effective as a full interruption test for ensuring RTOs are met. A cyber resilience test is a type of DR test that focuses on the ability to withstand and recover from cyberattacks. It does not necessarily cover other types of disasters or test the entire DRP. A tabletop test is a low-impact DR test that involves a walkthrough of the DRP with the key stakeholders and staff. It does not involve any actual switching over or testing of the backup systems. A parallel test is a type of DR test that involves running the backup systems alongside the primary systems, without disrupting the normal operations. It does not measure the time it takes to switch over or resume operations at the backup site.
References:
Best Practices For Disaster Recovery Testing
Disaster recovery testing
Disaster Recovery Testing: Everything to Know
CISA-KR 문제 119
사용자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 구현 후 검토를 수행했습니다. 다음 중 IS 감사인이 가장 우려해야 할 사항은 무엇입니까?
정답: B
Explanation
The greatest concern for an IS auditor when a post-implementation review was conducted by issuing a survey to users is that the survey questions did not address the scope of the business case. A post-implementation review is a process of evaluating the outcomes and benefits of a project after it has been completed and implemented. A post-implementation review can help to assess whether the project met its objectives, delivered its expected value, and satisfied its stakeholders1. A survey is a method of collecting feedback and opinions from users or other stakeholders about their experience and satisfaction with the project. A survey can help to measure the user acceptance, usability, and functionality of the project deliverables2. A business case is a document that justifies the need for a project based on its expected benefits, costs, risks, and alternatives. A business case defines the scope, objectives, and requirements of the project and provides a basis for its approval and initiation3. Therefore, an IS auditor should be concerned if the survey questions did not address the scope of the business case, as it may indicate that the post-implementation review was not comprehensive, relevant, or aligned with the project goals. The other options are less concerning or incorrect because:
A: The survey results were not presented in detail to management is not a great concern for an IS auditor when a post-implementation review was conducted by issuing a survey to users, as it is more of a communication or reporting issue than an audit issue. While presenting the survey results in detail to management may help to inform them about the project performance and outcomes, it does not affect the validity or quality of the post-implementation review itself.
C: The survey form template did not allow additional feedback to be provided is not a great concern for an IS auditor when a post-implementation review was conducted by issuing a survey to users, as it is more of a design or format issue than an audit issue. While allowing additional feedback to be provided may help to capture more insights or suggestions from users, it does not affect the validity or quality of the post-implementation review itself.
D: The survey was issued to employees a month after implementation is not a great concern for an IS auditor when a post-implementation review was conducted by issuing a survey to users, as it is more of a timing or scheduling issue than an audit issue. While issuing the survey to employees sooner after implementation may help to collect more accurate and timely feedback from users, it does not affect the validity or quality of the post-implementation review itself. References: Post Implementation Review - ISACA, Survey - ISACA, Business Case - ISACA
The greatest concern for an IS auditor when a post-implementation review was conducted by issuing a survey to users is that the survey questions did not address the scope of the business case. A post-implementation review is a process of evaluating the outcomes and benefits of a project after it has been completed and implemented. A post-implementation review can help to assess whether the project met its objectives, delivered its expected value, and satisfied its stakeholders1. A survey is a method of collecting feedback and opinions from users or other stakeholders about their experience and satisfaction with the project. A survey can help to measure the user acceptance, usability, and functionality of the project deliverables2. A business case is a document that justifies the need for a project based on its expected benefits, costs, risks, and alternatives. A business case defines the scope, objectives, and requirements of the project and provides a basis for its approval and initiation3. Therefore, an IS auditor should be concerned if the survey questions did not address the scope of the business case, as it may indicate that the post-implementation review was not comprehensive, relevant, or aligned with the project goals. The other options are less concerning or incorrect because:
A: The survey results were not presented in detail to management is not a great concern for an IS auditor when a post-implementation review was conducted by issuing a survey to users, as it is more of a communication or reporting issue than an audit issue. While presenting the survey results in detail to management may help to inform them about the project performance and outcomes, it does not affect the validity or quality of the post-implementation review itself.
C: The survey form template did not allow additional feedback to be provided is not a great concern for an IS auditor when a post-implementation review was conducted by issuing a survey to users, as it is more of a design or format issue than an audit issue. While allowing additional feedback to be provided may help to capture more insights or suggestions from users, it does not affect the validity or quality of the post-implementation review itself.
D: The survey was issued to employees a month after implementation is not a great concern for an IS auditor when a post-implementation review was conducted by issuing a survey to users, as it is more of a timing or scheduling issue than an audit issue. While issuing the survey to employees sooner after implementation may help to collect more accurate and timely feedback from users, it does not affect the validity or quality of the post-implementation review itself. References: Post Implementation Review - ISACA, Survey - ISACA, Business Case - ISACA
CISA-KR 문제 120
급여 신청에 관한 감사 결과에 대한 응답으로 경영진은 새로운 자동화 제어를 구현했습니다. 다음 중 새로운 제어의 효과를 평가할 때 IS 감사인에게 가장 도움이 되는 것은 무엇입니까?
정답: B
Explanation
The best way to evaluate the effectiveness of a new automated control is to review the written procedures that define the processes and controls. This will help the IS auditor to understand the objectives, scope, roles, responsibilities, and expected outcomes of the control. The written procedures will also provide a basis for testing the control and verifying its compliance with the audit finding recommendations. References:
ISACA Frameworks: Blueprints for Success
CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)
The best way to evaluate the effectiveness of a new automated control is to review the written procedures that define the processes and controls. This will help the IS auditor to understand the objectives, scope, roles, responsibilities, and expected outcomes of the control. The written procedures will also provide a basis for testing the control and verifying its compliance with the audit finding recommendations. References:
ISACA Frameworks: Blueprints for Success
CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)
- 다른 버전
- 3860ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-05-16.q709
- 1771ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-05-06.q261
- 3095ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-03-16.q665
- 4445ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-03-07.q651
- 9182ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-04-07.q633
- 4438ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-04-03.q628
- 3635ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-04-02.q544
- 4196ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-03-31.q534
- 5300ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-03-28.q617
- 3089ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-03-19.q581
- 3960ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-03-03.q807
- 2793ISACA.CISA-KR.v2024-01-31.q392
- 5260ISACA.CISA-KR.v2023-10-24.q329
- 5180ISACA.CISA-KR.v2023-07-31.q266
- 3098ISACA.CISA-KR.v2023-06-23.q324
- 최근 업로드
- 106Microsoft.DP-900-KR.v2026-08-13.q130
- 227Microsoft.PL-600.v2026-08-11.q206
- 165Microsoft.DP-100.v2026-08-11.q160
- 166Oracle.1Z0-1048-25.v2026-08-11.q68
- 140ISQI.CTAL-TAE.v2026-08-11.q37
- 183ServiceNow.CIS-HR.v2026-08-11.q84
- 255Salesforce.Plat-Arch-201.v2026-08-10.q101
- 240Databricks.Databricks-Machine-Learning-Professional.v2026-08-10.q76
- 189F5.F5CAB2.v2026-08-10.q41
- 292APA.CPP-Remote.v2026-08-08.q109
[×]
PDF 파일 다운로드
메일 주소를 입력하시고 다운로드 하세요. ISACA.CISA-KR.v2024-02-07.q421 모의시험 시험자료를 다운 받으세요.