C_S4TM_2601 무료 덤프문제 온라인 액세스

CHALLENGE 4 - Emergency Premiums and Container Cost Allocation
Routine route charges calculate correctly, but emergency premiums are missing when freight orders are manually adjusted after priority assignment. Finance can still post settlement, but the cost explanation is incomplete.
What should the team validate?
Response:

• A.Whether emergency premiums should be replaced with a single average route surcharge for easier posting.
• B.Whether manually adjusted freight orders still carry the priority attributes required by premium conditions and settlement allocation.
• C.Whether routine shipments should be excluded from all future charge calculation tests.
• D.Whether event tracking should be completed after settlement to improve cost reporting.

A regional commercial flooring distributor is validating strategic freight procurement in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management for delivery lanes requiring job-site unloading support. Procurement selects a carrier agreement that includes base freight and an unloading-assistance fee. Freight orders execute correctly, and base freight appears in settlement simulation, but the unloading fee is not distributed to the originating delivery items used for project profitability review.
Finance requires accurate delivery-level allocation before postings are released for job-site lanes. Procurement wants standard delivery agreement testing to continue because those lanes already calculate and distribute charges correctly. The constraint is to validate the selected unloading-support agreement without stopping unaffected procurement and settlement testing.
Which action best supports the target process?
Response:

• A.Release job-site settlement postings because the selected carrier agreement already calculates base freight correctly.
• B.Replace the unloading-support agreement with a standard delivery agreement so settlement uses a simpler charge structure.
• C.Validate the agreement-based charge calculation and cost distribution setup for the unloading-assistance fee before releasing affected postings.
• D.Stop all carrier agreement testing until unloading-support and standard delivery conditions are validated together.

A regional automotive parts supplier is testing freight settlement in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management after introducing a new carrier agreement for expedited dealer replenishment. Freight orders are created and executed correctly, and base freight charges calculate as expected. During settlement simulation, the expedited service premium appears on the freight order but is not allocated to the delivery items used for dealer profitability reporting.
Finance needs accurate delivery-level allocation before settlement postings for expedited lanes are released. Logistics wants normal dealer replenishment settlement testing to continue because those lanes already calculate and distribute costs correctly. The constraint is to protect profitability reporting without stopping unaffected settlement validation.
Which action best supports the validation requirement?
Response:

• A.Release the expedited settlement postings because the premium is visible at freight order level.
• B.Correct and validate the cost distribution setup for the expedited premium before releasing settlement postings for the affected lanes.
• C.Stop all dealer replenishment settlement testing until expedited and standard lanes are validated together.
• D.Remove the expedited service premium from the agreement and add it later during profitability reporting review.

CHALLENGE 3 - Warehouse Handover and Freight Order Timing
During integrated testing, pick waves are released based on preliminary transport proposals. When planners later change freight orders for constrained refrigerated routes, staged pallets must be moved to different docks.
What is the best second-order diagnosis?
Response:

• A.Warehouse handover is consuming transport proposals before freight order information is stable enough for execution.
• B.Transportation lanes are unnecessary for refrigerated routes because manual staging can replace planning controls.
• C.Carrier master data should be removed from the planning process until warehouse staging is complete.
• D.Freight settlement grouping is incorrect because delivery-item costs are being distributed after dock staging.

A regional office supplies wholesaler is extending SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management to support direct-to-branch replenishment from a newly opened consolidation hub. The hub has been created as a transportation location, and the intended branch lanes are active. During testing, replenishment deliveries from the hub create freight units, but those freight units are grouped under an old regional planning area instead of the new hub-based planning structure.
The rollout team finds that the hub was copied from a former cross-dock location during migration preparation. The constraint is to correct the new hub flow while preserving the validated transportation setup for existing regional replenishment routes.
Which action best resolves the planning assignment issue?
Response:

• A.Manually move the affected freight units into the new planning area until the hub rollout is complete.
• B.Disable freight unit creation for the new hub until all copied location data can be reviewed across the landscape.
• C.Correct the transportation master data assignment for the new hub so freight units bind to the intended hub-based planning structure.
• D.Rebuild all regional replenishment lanes so old and new locations use one harmonized planning structure.