C_S4TM_2601 무료 덤프문제 온라인 액세스

A regional commercial water-treatment supplier is adding depot-to-test-lab movements in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management while outbound customer delivery remains stable. Test-lab transfer requirements from two depots should create freight units for the same lab location. During testing, one depot creates transportation demand correctly, but the second depot's transfers are routed toward an inactive sample-logistics structure.
The active transportation network contains the test lab and intended carrier lanes. The rollout team finds that the second depot retained a legacy transportation relationship from a phased migration. The constraint is to correct only the intended test-lab transfer flow without changing stable outbound delivery behavior or activating unrelated depot movements.
Which action best resolves the assignment issue?
Response:

• A.Manually redirect affected freight units to the test lab until migration data review is complete.
• B.Activate transportation relevance for all depot movements so every sample-related document can be evaluated by planning.
• C.Correct the second depot's transportation location and relevance assignment so intended test-lab transfers bind to the active lab lanes.
• D.Rebuild outbound delivery lanes so every depot uses one harmonized transportation location relationship.

A regional laboratory supplies company uses SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management to plan shipments to clinics and central storerooms. Automatic planning reduces freight order count, but clinic shipments with appointment-based receiving windows are consolidated with routine storeroom replenishment. The freight orders are executable and use the intended carrier, but some clinic deliveries miss their receiving appointments.
Clinic operations wants appointment windows protected, while logistics wants to retain consolidation savings for routine replenishment. The constraint is to keep automatic planning and carrier subcontracting active while ensuring appointment-based delivery requirements influence freight order formation before execution.
Which planning decision best fits the constraint?
Response:

• A.Adjust planning criteria so appointment-based receiving windows restrict consolidation before freight orders are finalized.
• B.Increase consolidation weighting so the optimizer continues reducing total freight order count across clinics and storerooms.
• C.Keep the current planning setup and ask clinic operations to renegotiate missed receiving appointments after planning.
• D.Exclude all clinic shipments from automatic planning so planners can manage appointments manually.

An industrial packaging company is using SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management to consolidate daily shipments from several warehouses into fewer outbound freight orders. Automatic planning produces technically executable freight orders, but planners notice that consolidation across two nearby warehouses increases loading coordination time and causes several freight orders to miss the carrier handover window.
Operations wants to keep consolidation benefits, while dispatch requires freight orders to remain executable within the daily pickup schedule. The planning profile was tuned mainly for freight cost reduction during the pilot. The constraint is to improve planning results without abandoning automatic planning or removing consolidation for all lanes.
Which action best addresses the planning issue?
Response:

• A.Switch the affected lanes to interactive planning so planners can decide each consolidation manually before carrier handover.
• B.Increase carrier capacity assumptions so automatic planning can keep creating fewer freight orders across both warehouses.
• C.Keep the current planning result and ask warehouse teams to adjust loading schedules after freight orders are released.
• D.Modify the planning setup so consolidation decisions consider pickup timing and execution feasibility for the affected warehouse combination.

A regional maintenance supplies distributor is validating strategic freight procurement in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management for priority replacement-part lanes. Procurement selects a carrier agreement with base freight and a guaranteed-delivery fee. Freight orders execute correctly, and base freight appears in settlement simulation, but the guaranteed-delivery fee is not distributed to the originating delivery items used for service profitability review.
Finance requires accurate service-level cost allocation before postings are released for priority lanes. Procurement wants standard replacement-part agreement testing to continue because those lanes already calculate and distribute charges correctly. The constraint is to validate the selected priority agreement without stopping unaffected procurement and settlement testing.
Which action best supports the target process?
Response:

• A.Release priority-lane settlement postings because the selected carrier agreement already calculates base freight correctly.
• B.Replace the priority agreement with a standard agreement so settlement uses a simpler charge structure.
• C.Validate the agreement-based charge calculation and cost distribution setup for the guaranteed-delivery fee before releasing affected postings.
• D.Stop all replacement-part agreement testing until priority and standard conditions are validated together.

A regional industrial fasteners distributor is validating SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management execution for warehouse-managed dock appointments. Freight orders are planned and assigned to carriers, and warehouse users confirm dock loading completion. Carrier communication is sent successfully, but the transportation execution status remains unchanged for freight orders handled through the new dock appointment flow.
The transportation team confirms that the freight orders are not blocked and that loading completion is recorded in the warehouse process. The constraint is to keep the new dock appointment flow introduced during modernization while removing manual status updates before freight order completion.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:

• A.Validate the status and event binding for the new dock appointment flow so warehouse loading completion updates transportation execution status.
• B.Ask transportation users to update execution status manually after every dock loading confirmation.
• C.Regenerate carrier communication because successful dispatch output should update the execution status.
• D.Move the affected shipments back to the prior dock flow because it already updated execution status automatically.