C-DBADM-2601 무료 덤프문제 온라인 액세스

CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
During cutover readiness rehearsal, warehouse test users can open freight capacity reports from both SAP HANA systems. The installed validation database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded distribution reporting system has one stabilization value recorded only in monitoring notes. What should the administrator do before accepting the cutover comparison?

• A.Continue cutover preparation and review the monitoring notes only if users report inconsistent results.
• B.Accept the comparison because both systems return the required reports during rehearsal.
• C.Reconcile the stabilization value into the upgraded system's current administration record.
• D.Remove the documented value from the validation database record so both systems appear aligned.

CHALLENGE 3 - Quota and Source Coordination for Multi-Vendor Materials
The sourcing lead wants to preserve vendor-sharing for priority materials so the first live week has more resilient coverage. A plant buyer wants to simplify those same materials to a single vendor during cutover because the order path looks more stable. Which option is most appropriate?

• A.Switch all priority materials to a single vendor because cutover stability always outweighs sourcing resilience
• B.Preserve the intended multi-vendor pattern and verify whether source coordination can remain stable under representative cross-plant demand
• C.Postpone supplier-sharing validation until invoice continuity testing is complete
• D.Let each plant decide which materials will use multi-vendor behavior during the first live week

A utilities provider operates SAP HANA in a mixed landscape, with an on-premises database supporting operational workloads and SAP HANA Cloud used for newer reporting services. During the morning review, administrators see that the database remains available and scheduled backups completed, but one recurring health check now reports sustained delay in a narrow set of monitoring results.
General user activity is unaffected. A junior team member recommends broad resource expansion because delayed monitoring often appears during heavier runtime periods. The operations lead wants the first step to stay within the existing maintenance scope and identify whether the slowdown is caused by the monitoring design itself or by an actual platform issue.
What is the best first action?

• A.Suppress the delayed health check temporarily because user-facing activity is still functioning normally.
• B.Increase system resources immediately because a delayed monitoring result usually confirms growing platform pressure.
• C.Review whether the delayed monitoring check is tied to a specific workload pattern or collection scope before changing system capacity.
• D.Restart the database instance so that all monitoring indicators are recalculated from a clean operational state.

CHALLENGE 4 - Service Continuity Recovery Gate
The service lead can accept hypercare readiness on schedule using backup completion evidence, or delay briefly to include recovery validation for the stabilization database and recoverability evidence for the upgraded system. Which path is most defensible?

• A.Delay briefly to complete recoverability evidence for systems supporting the readiness package.
• B.Accept on schedule and attach recovery validation to the future SAP HANA Cloud migration plan.
• C.Cancel the readiness decision because recovery validation was not completed before testing began.
• D.Accept on schedule because meeting the service review date is the strongest governance outcome.

CHALLENGE 4 - Close Recovery Readiness Gate
Backups completed for the upgraded claims reporting system and the newly installed validation database before close rehearsal. Recovery validation for the validation database is scheduled but not complete, and the upgraded system has only backup completion evidence. What should happen before final close sign-off?

• A.Replace recovery validation with dashboard availability because this is a rehearsal cycle.
• B.Approve close sign-off because backup completion is enough for first close continuity.
• C.Complete recovery validation and document startup behavior for the close-cycle systems.
• D.Perform recovery validation only if close reporting becomes unavailable.