ISO-14001-Lead-Auditor 무료 덤프문제 온라인 액세스

Showitoff is an organisation specialising in the design and production of wall decorating materials for the domestic market. During an ISO 14001 certification audit of the site, the auditor comes across an open, walled area just outside the maintenance department. It contains various scraps of wood and metal as well as several rusty components. They are lying on an oily floor. When asked about it, the EMS Manager states that he presumes that the materials come from maintenance work.
The auditor interviews the Maintenance Manager in his department. He notes that shelves containing various spares are well labelled and neatly stacked. He asked about the "dump" outside and is told that it contains some excess materials that the Manager likes to keep in case they come in handy at some stage. The auditor points out that the "dump" might be classed under regulations as a landfill site, which requires an operating licence. The Maintenance Manager is not aware of such a licence.
The auditor decides to review the process for evaluation of compliance with environmental regulations in more depth.
Select three options that provide a meaningful audit trail for this process.

• A.How is the material content of scrap items verified?
• B.Are operators trained in the identification of legal requirements?
• C.What are the qualifications of the EMS and Maintenance Managers?
• D.What environmental aspects have been identified as being associated with regulations?
• E.How is the handling of waste materials monitored?
• F.How is the cost of unused or excess materials calculated?
• G.How are maintenance staff made aware of regulatory requirements?
• H.Is a regulatory expert employed on the internal audit programme?

An audit team leader arrives at a steel fabrication organisation that manufactures fire escape stairs to carry out a Stage 2 certification audit. At a meeting with the EMS Manager, she is told that they have won their biggest contract from a construction organisation to manufacture and install fire escape stairs. They appointed a subcontractor to perform the installation work. The EMS Manager wants the ISO 14001 audit extended to cover the installation site.
Select which one of the options is the correct response by the auditor.

• A.Can you arrange to bring the installation team here so that we can include this in the audit?
• B.Do you realise that this involves an extension to the scope of the audit and will require an application process?
• C.Would you write to my audit programme manager with this request?
• D.We have used all our allocated time in preparation for this audit so how can we extend the audit scope?

A chain of 10 paint shops in a city has established an EMS following the requirements of ISO 14001, which was third-party certified 10 years ago. You are performing a second-party audit. The audit plan included an interview with the General Manager (GM). The dialogue was as follows:
You: Hi, good evening, I have seen a well-developed environmental risk assessment process. However, I did not find the identification of emergency situations included in the results of this process. The Environmental Manager (EM) could not provide me with an acceptable answer to this question.
GM: The EM joined us 2 months ago, and he may not know some decisions we made some time ago, when we first certified our EMS. During those days, I met with all 10 supervisors and asked them what the emergencies were that they feared most. They unanimously said: fire. That was it. This is the only emergency we care of. As far as I remember we do not test the plan very often because the supervisors of all our 10 shops know it very well. The auditors of our certification body accepted this. We did not have a fire in the last 10 years.
What evidence would you need to review to determine conformity with ISO 14001 in this scenario? Select six.

• A.Results of the inspection of fire extinguishers
• B.Replacements of supervisors of each shop when they are absent (for any reason)
• C.Reports of the last two fire drills you performed
• D.More details on whether the risk assessment process was applied to emergencies
• E.General competence records of all 10 supervisors
• F.Reports of the management reviews
• G.Minutes of the meeting with supervisors where a fire was determined as the only emergency situation
• H.Signage related to health and safety in each shop
• I.Reports of audits from the certification body
• J.Records of the specific fire combat training of workers
• K.Shops that have tested the plan in the last 10 years

A group of 22 Italian restaurants in downtown San Francisco (US) established an EMS following the requirements of ISO 14001. You are performing an internal audit before the fourth certification cycle. The audit plan included an audit of the General Manager (GM) as the last interview before the closing meeting.
During the interview with the GM, you audit clause 10.3 (Continual improvement). The dialogue is as follows.
You: Could you please tell me how did you improve the EMS to enhance environmental performance (Clause
10.3)?
GM: One way to improve the EMS is to improve one or several of its processes. We decided to improve the water-consuming processes in all our branches. We use water in many of our processes (e.g. to wash our kitchens, our cutlery, plates, and glasses, to keep our floors clean). The idea was to review these processes in detail to reduce the amount of water used per customer. Each of the 22 branches sent us their results, we analysed the data and found out that the average water consumption per customer was reduced by 13%; therefore, we improved our environmental performance. We are happy about that.
You: What about the results in each branch?
GM: Have a look at this table:

Analysing this table, what would be your decision related to raising nonconformities to clause 10.3? Select two.

• A.I would raise a nonconformity for branches in D
• B.I would raise a nonconformity for branches in B
• C.I would raise an opportunity for improvement for branches in B, C, and D
• D.I would raise a nonconformity for branches in C and D
• E.I would not raise any nonconformity
• F.I would raise a nonconformity for the whole group

An internal auditor of a manufacturer of aluminium products for the car industry raised a nonconformity against section 6.2.2 of ISO 14001 in Report IA202. The nonconformity (NC3) stated:
"Top management has not analysed why none of the environmental objectives set for the last year have been met." A third-party auditor reviewing the internal audit process came across the nonconformity and found that no corrective action was documented. The EMS Manager confirmed no action had been taken, but added he expected a number of objectives to be achieved in the next three months so there was no need for further action. He explained in confidence that the organisation was fighting a takeover bid and resources for environmental projects had been cut.
From the information, select three non-conformities options that the auditor could raise to ISO 14001.

• A.7.4.3 - Management should communicate the impacts of the takeover on the EMS to the bidders
• B.9.2.2 - Report IA202 contained a nonconformity (NC3) lacking in necessary detail
• C.9.3 - A management review should be undertaken to determine the implications of the takeover on the EMS
• D.10.2.a - Management failed to take corrective action to deal with the audit nonconformity
• E.7.4.2 - Staff were not made aware that environmental projects were being scaled back
• F.7.1 - The top management failed to provide the resources needed to meet the objectives
• G.6.2.2 - Actions were not taken to fully implement the environmental objectives set by management
• H.6.2.1 - New environmental objectives associated with the takeover should be set