L4M1 무료 덤프문제 온라인 액세스

How to approach the question
Your answer should provide details on 3 of the following:
- Contract Award and Implementation
- Warehouse Logistics
- Contract performance and Improvement
- Supplier Relationship Management
- Asset Management
Because the question is only asking for 3 stages, you're going to have to go much more into detail for each stage, giving lots of information about why each stage is important and examples. You could consider thinking of an example procurement you have done recently and explaining the stages for that. Or you could take a hypothetical procurement too. Either will get you the same marks. Pick the three that you can write the most about.
Essay Plan
Introduction - explain that sourcing of goods and the role of Procurement doesn't end once a contract is signed. There is ongoing management and processes which must be carried out to ensure success.
Paragraph 1 - Contract Performance and Improvement
This is about ensuring contract obligations are fulfilled. Contract administration includes P2P procedures, database management, budgeting / costs monitoring, reporting and dispute resolution
Procurement's role may be in managing contract performance through the use of SLAs and / or KPIs. This can be done via reporting, using a Supplier Scorecard and meeting regularly to discuss.
It's important KPIs are measured and that there are consequences for failing to meet them. An example of consequences could be using a Performance Improvement Plan.
Contract Management also includes updating the contract where required - e.g. issuing variations to contract and updating the change control log
Another important aspect of this is ensuring the costs remain within scope of the budget
Contract performance can be compared if you have several suppliers delivering the same goods- could use a Factor Rating Method.
Performance could be measured against several criteria such as on time deliveries, response time of supplier, number of complaints.
Paragraph 2 - Supplier Relationship Management
There is a difference between managing the contract and managing the supplier relationship. It's possible to have excellent contract performance and a terrible relationship. However, the two are generally linked- where there is a good relationship, the contract often performs well.
The supplier management approach depends on where the relationship falls on the relationship spectrum (e.
g. transactional or collaborative)
This involves; maintaining regular contact with the supplier, motivating the supplier, working collaboratively with them (e.g. on performance issues or resolving any disputes)
Incentivising the supplier leads to collaboration and mutual support
To assess or rank suppliers you could use a vendor rating method or supplier evaluation forms
Supplier relationship management may involve investing in the supplier- e.g. through training or technology sharing Paragraph 3 - Asset Management
Includes creating a post contract 'lessons-learned'
Assessments should be carried out to determine if business requirements have changed, whether the agreement is still required and fit for purpose, what can be learnt from the process and how improvements can be incorporated next time.
This is the final stage of the Procurement Cycle and takes us back to the start of cycle, which begins again when the item needs to be reprocured
Whole life costing should be considered at this stage: this is the total cost of ownership over the life of an asset. The concept is also known as life-cycle cost (LCC) or lifetime cost, and is commonly referred to as
"cradle to grave" or "womb to tomb" costs.
Generally used on large purchases such as machinery and vehicles. Full Asset Management may not necessary for direct cost items such as raw materials incorporated into final goods.
Considerations may include; costs of running the asset, how long it will perform, insurance, maintenance, opportunity costs, disposing of the asset.
Also consider environmental and social impacts of the procurement.
Conclusion - it is important that procurement are involved at every stage of the cycle, not just in the pre- award stages. Procurement can add value at every stage.
Tutor Notes
- Depending on the examples you choose to use, you could talk about how the type of item procured could impact on the different stages. For example, high risk purchases may require more contract management than low risk purchases, and capital expenditure items such as new machinery may require more attention to the Asset Management stage.
- You could also think about how procurement adds value at each of the stages.
- Study guide p. 79

See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- Sometimes CIPS give you a steer on how to answer the question. My advice is to follow it. The question says you MAY make reference to the following, but I'd use those hints as a guide for content- a paragraph on each and you're done!
- When you've got a 'may make reference to' hint - this means you can completely ignore it and do your own thing and bring in your own ideas. May means it's optional, so you wouldn't be penalised for this. However, you have to consider the examiner's mark scheme- it will detail options of stuff you can write for funding, ownership etc. Then there will be a line at the bottom saying something like 'accept other options such as x and y'. This leaves it up to the examiner to decide whether what you've said is relevant. I'd personally not leave it up to chance you get a lenient examiner. If you write what's definitely going to be on their mark scheme, you're more likely to get more points.
Example Essay
The modern economy is a complex tapestry of various sectors, each with its own distinct characteristics and functions. The three prominent sectors are the public sector, the private sector, and the third sector. These sectors differ significantly in terms of their funding mechanisms, ownership structures, objectives, the concept of shares, and their administration.
Firstly, the public sector is predominantly funded by the government through taxation, grants, and other forms of public revenue. Its very existence hinges on the provision of essential services and the fulfilment of societal needs. These organizations are owned by the government, be it at the federal, state, or local level. Unlike the private sector, the concept of shares doesn't apply in the public sector. Instead, the government allocates budgets to various departments and agencies for public services and projects. The primary objectives of the public sector revolve around the welfare of the citizens, including the provision of education, healthcare, defence, and infrastructure. It is characterized by bureaucratic administration, with decision-making processes subject to governmental regulations and oversight. A prime example is public schools and healthcare systems, which are funded and operated by the government with the primary objective of ensuring universal access to education and healthcare services.
In contrast, the private sector operates on a starkly different paradigm. It is primarily funded by private capital, investment, and profit-seeking activities. Private individuals and corporations own these entities, with ownership shares often represented by stocks. Shareholders invest capital in exchange for ownership stakes and the potential for dividends. The central objective in the private sector is profit maximization, driven by competition in the market. Companies in the private sector are administered by management teams and boards of directors, with decisions guided by market forces. Apple and ExxonMobil are examples of private sector entities, privately owned and publicly traded, with profit motives at their core. Shareholders invest in these companies with the expectation of financial returns.
Lastly, the third sector, often referred to as the nonprofit or voluntary sector, represents a unique economic sphere. It relies on a combination of funding sources, including donations, grants, and earned income, but not taxation. Third sector organizations are not owned by individuals or shareholders; instead, they are governed by boards of directors or trustees. Unlike the private sectors, shares are not applicable in the third sector.
These organizations do not seek to distribute profits to owners. The primary objective of the third sector is to serve a social or community purpose, such as addressing societal issues, promoting social change, and providing services that benefit the public. Administration in this sector is overseen by non-profit boards, and it heavily relies on volunteers, philanthropy, and community engagement. For example, the Red Cross operates with the objective of providing humanitarian aid and disaster relief, relying on donations and volunteers to fulfil its mission. Any profits that are made are reinvested into the organisation to further its mission.
In conclusion, the public, private, and third sectors represent diverse economic domains, each with its own funding mechanisms, ownership structures, objectives, and administrative models. These sectors play essential and complementary roles in society, contributing to economic development, public welfare, and social progress. Together, they form the foundation of a balanced and dynamic economic landscape.
Tutor Notes
- I've structured this essay with a paragraph on each sector, but you could have done a paragraph on each theme, thus having 5 paragraphs instead of 3. Either approach works.
- You've got 5 things and 3 sectors, that equals 15 marks. If you give an example of each and a strong intro and conclusion, that's full marks.
- See LO 4.1 p. 203 - there's a cute table with this information on.

See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
- The question is asking you to explain the following:
- With this type of question you would be expected to discuss 3- 5 differences, giving examples.
Example Essay Structure
Introduction - explain what is meant by 'procurement' and 'SCM' - procurement is the traditional way and is to do with purchasing goods, SCM is the new way which is a more multifaceted way of securing goods and is the result of longer, more complex and more globalised supply chains.
Paragraph 1 - the objectives of each approach (5 Rights vs added value) Paragraph 2 - the approach (reactive buying vs proactive ordering) Paragraph 3 - the way of working (silo working vs cross-functional working) Paragraph 4 - the relationships with suppliers (transactional vs collaborative) Conclusion - There are many differences between the two approaches, and different companies may favour one over the other depending on their specific circumstances. E.g. small organisations that make low value and low risk purchases may take a traditional procurement approach and large multi- national organisations may require a SRM approach due to the volume of suppliers and com-plexities of the supply chains.
Example essay:
Procurement and Supply Chain Management (SCM) represent two distinct approaches to acquiring goods, reflecting the evolution of purchasing practices. Procurement, the traditional method, in-volves the straightforward purchase of goods. In contrast, SCM is a more intricate approach, born out of longer, more complex, and globalized supply chains. This essay explores the main differences between these two approaches, highlighting their objectives, methods, ways of working, and suppli-er relationships.
In the traditional procurement approach, the focus is on achieving the "5 Rights" - getting the right goods, in the right quantity, at the right quality, for the right price, and at the right time. This en-sures efficiency in the purchasing process. On the other hand, SCM goes beyond these basic objec-tives, aiming to add value to the entire supply chain. This might involve developing strategic rela-tionships with suppliers, ensuring sustainability, and aligning with broader organizational goals. For example, a company employing a traditional procurement approach might emphasize getting the lowest price, while an SCM approach could involve working with suppliers to enhance product in-novation or reduce environmental impact.
Secondly, the traditional procurement approach is often reactive, responding to immediate needs or demands. Companies using this method typically make purchases as required, without a long-term strategy. In contrast, SCM involves proactive ordering, anticipating future needs and trends. For instance, a company employing SCM might engage in demand forecasting, allowing for better plan- ning and inventory management. This proactive approach helps prevent stockouts, reduce costs, and enhance overall supply chain efficiency.
Moreover, traditional procurement often involves silo working, where different departments operate independently. The procurement team may not collaborate closely with other departments like pro- duction or marketing. In SCM, there's an emphasis on cross-functional working, breaking down de- partmental barriers for a more integrated approach. For example, an SCM team might work closely with production to ensure materials are aligned with manufacturing schedules, fostering efficiency and minimizing disruptions.
Lastly, in traditional procurement, the relationship with suppliers is transactional - focused solely on the exchange of goods for money. Conversely, SCM promotes collaborative relationships, emphasiz-ing long-term partnerships. A company using SCM might work closely with suppliers to improve processes, share information, and jointly address challenges. For instance, an SCM approach might involve collaborating with suppliers to implement just-in-time inventory systems, leading to cost savings and improved responsiveness.
In conclusion, the differences between traditional procurement and SCM are substantial and nu-anced.
While a traditional procurement approach may suit smaller organizations with low-value and low-risk purchases, larger multinational companies with complex supply chains often find SCM more suitable.
Understanding these differences allows companies to tailor their approach based on their unique circumstances, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and strategic alignment with organizational goals in the ever-evolving landscape of buying and supply chain management.
Tutor Notes
- This question is taken from learning outcome 1.1.1 (p2 onwards). The new study guide has drasti-cally simplified the information on this topic compared to the old syllabus (the table above comes from the old syllabus). This may be good news for students in that you don't need to know as much, but I do wonder if the study guide gives students enough 'content' to write an essay on the subject.
- If a question is to come up from LO 1.1 it would be likely be something like: definitions and dif- ferences between procurement and SCM, difference between a supply chain and a supply network, elements of SCM, or how to add value in the supply chain.

See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
In procurement and supply, adding value means going beyond simple cost savings to enhance the overall contribution of procurement to the organization's objectives. Added value can be generated in multiple ways, impacting cost, quality, efficiency, innovation, and sustainability. Below are five key sources of added value in procurement and supply, analysed in detail:
1. Cost Reduction and Cost Avoidance
* Definition: Cost reduction involves lowering the actual purchase price of goods or services, while cost avoidance refers to actions that prevent costs from increasing in the future.
* Explanation: Through effective supplier negotiations, competitive tendering, bulk purchasing, and long-term contracts, procurement can achieve significant cost savings. Cost avoidance can come from proactive management of risks, improving contract terms, or optimizing specifications to prevent future price hikes.
* Impact: This directly improves the organization's profitability by reducing expenditure without compromising quality or service levels.
* Example: Renegotiating supplier contracts to achieve better rates or standardizing materials to reduce complexity and cost.
2. Improved Quality and Performance
* Definition: Enhancing the quality of goods and services procured to meet or exceed organizational needs.
* Explanation: Procurement contributes added value by specifying and sourcing higher quality materials or services that reduce defects, returns, and downtime. Better quality improves customer satisfaction and product reliability.
* Impact: Higher quality inputs lead to better outputs, reducing internal failures and enhancing brand reputation.
* Example: Working with suppliers to implement quality assurance processes or selecting suppliers with robust certification and testing capabilities.
3. Innovation and Supplier Collaboration
* Definition: Encouraging suppliers to contribute innovative ideas, technologies, or processes that benefit the organization.
* Explanation: Procurement can create value by fostering collaborative relationships with suppliers to drive product innovation, process improvements, and new market opportunities. Early supplier involvement can reduce development times and costs.
* Impact: Innovation enhances competitive advantage, supports new product development, and can open up new revenue streams.
* Example: Joint development projects with suppliers or using supplier expertise to redesign components for cost efficiency and performance improvement.
4. Risk Management and Supply Continuity
* Definition: Identifying and mitigating risks in the supply chain to ensure uninterrupted supply.
* Explanation: Procurement adds value by assessing supplier reliability, geopolitical risks, financial stability, and logistical challenges to minimize disruptions. Contingency planning and diversified sourcing reduce vulnerability.
* Impact: Reliable supply chains prevent costly production stoppages and reputational damage, contributing to operational resilience.
* Example: Developing dual sourcing strategies or monitoring supplier performance and compliance continuously.
5. Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
* Definition: Integrating environmental and social considerations into procurement decisions.
* Explanation: Procurement adds value by selecting suppliers who comply with sustainability standards, ethical labor practices, and environmental regulations. This aligns with organizational CSR goals and reduces negative impacts.
* Impact: Enhances brand image, meets regulatory requirements, and can reduce waste and resource consumption.
* Example: Choosing suppliers with certified green practices or implementing circular economy principles in supply chains.
Conclusion:
Added value in procurement and supply extends beyond price savings to include quality enhancement, innovation, risk mitigation, and sustainability. By strategically managing supplier relationships and aligning procurement activities with organizational goals, procurement professionals can deliver significant and measurable benefits that improve competitive advantage and organizational performance.

See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
- Mention of some of the following benefits with at least one example provided against each; cost savings, time savings, more efficient, higher levels of transparency, easier to access historical records to inform upon decision making, mitigates risks such as fraudulent spending, easier to track spend against budgets, ensures compliance with regulations, provides 'real-time' information, paperless communications (so more environmentally friendly), assists in Supply Chain Management and integration with supply partners.
- I'd suggest 5 is a good amount to aim for
Example Essay
Procurement stands to gain numerous benefits from the adoption of electronic systems. These electronic tools and systems bring efficiency, accuracy, transparency, and cost-effectiveness to the procurement process. Here are several compelling reasons why procurement should leverage electronic systems:
Cost savings - the use of electronic tools saves organisations money. Although there is an initial cost outlay, over time the systems will save the organisation money. For example the use of e-procurement tools can save money by accessing a wider pool of suppliers. For example, when using an e-sourcing portal, a tender may reach a larger number of suppliers- this makes the tender more competitive thus driving down prices.
Compared to traditional methods such as phoning suppliers for prices, the use of electronic portals encourages suppliers to 'sharpen their pencils' and provide the best prices in order to win work. Money is also saved as communication is digital (so there is no costs for paper and postage).
Time savings - electronic tools automate a lot of processes which saves time. An example of this is e- requisitioning tools where orders can be placed automatically by a piece of technology when quantities of a material reach a certain level. For example, in a cake manufacturing organisation they may use an MRP system which calculates how many eggs are required per day. The machine knows that when the company only have 50 eggs left, a new order needs to be issued to the supplier. The MRP system (e-requisitioning system) therefore saves time as the Procurement department doesn't have to manually pick up the phone to place the order with the supplier- it is done automatically.
Access to higher levels of information - e-Procurement gives you centralised access to all your data. You can access the system to look at historical purchases with ease compared to having to dig through folders and filing cabinets. For example, an electronic PO system will hold details of all historical POs, this means if someone has a question about a PO that was raised 4 months ago, finding the information is much easier and quicker. Some systems may also be able to provide analytical data such as changes to spend over time, or which suppliers a buyer spends the most money with. This higher level of information can help inform upon future decision making. For example, if the organisation wishes to consolidate its supplier base it would look through historical data provided by the electronic system to find out which suppliers are used the least and remove these from the 'pre-approved supplier list'. This level of data might not be available in manual systems.
Better budget tracking - using electronic systems allows for real-time information to be collected which allows Procurement Managers to see where spend is compared to forecasts and budgets. An example of this is in the use of Pre-Payment Cards - rather than giving staff members petty cash to make transactions and having to chase this up and collect receipts and change, a pre-payment card usually comes with an online portal where a manager can see what has been purchased and the remaining budget on that card for the month.
A manager may be able to see for example that a member of staff has spend £300 of their allotted £500 monthly allowance.
Higher levels of transparency and control - using E-procurement tools allows an organisation to track who is ordering what. For example, an e-requisitioning tool may allow Procurement Assistants to make purchases up to £500 but set an automatic escalation if they try to buy something of higher value. This allows for Management to have greater levels of visibility and more control over spending. Another example of transparency and control is in the use of e-sourcing tools to run a competitive tender exercise. All communication between the buyer and suppliers is tracked on the system and award letters can be sent via the system too. This reduces the risk of information being lost.
Environmental benefits- the use of e-procurement tools means that there is less paperwork involved. For example, rather than creating a physical PO which needs to be signed by a manager, an electronic system can allow a manager to sign-off the purchase by clicking a button. This means there is no requirement for the document to be printed. This saves paper and thus has a positive on the environment. Using electronic systems may help an organisation achieve their environmental targets.
In conclusion there are numerous benefits for procurement to adopt e-procurement tools. Depending on the sector and requirements of each individualised company, some advantages may be more pertinent than others, but it is undeniable that technology is helping to shape the industry into a value adding function of organisations.
Tutor Notes
- With an essay like this you could use subheadings and number the advantages if you like. It's a good idea to do one advantage per paragraph and using formatting really helps the examiner to read your essay.
- study guide p.108