CISA-KR 문제 566
정보 시스템(IS) 감사 담당자가 조직 내 IT 거버넌스를 개선하기 위한 방안에 대해 자문을 요청받았습니다. 다음 중 가장 적절한 권고 사항은 무엇입니까?
정답: C
The best recommendation to improve IT governance within the organization is C. Require executive management to draft IT strategy. IT governance is the process of establishing and maintaining the policies, roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities for managing technology risks within an organization1. One of the key objectives of IT governance is to ensure alignment and integration between technology and business strategies, leading to optimal outcomes and value creation1. Therefore, it is essential that executive management, who are responsible for setting the vision, mission, and goals of the organization, are also involved in drafting the IT strategy that supports and enables them. By requiring executive management to draft IT strategy, the organization can:
Ensure that the IT strategy is consistent and coherent with the business strategy, and reflects the organization' s priorities, values, and culture2.
Enhance communication and collaboration between IT and business functions, and foster a shared understanding and commitment to the IT strategy2.
Increase accountability and transparency for IT performance and outcomes, and ensure that IT investments are aligned with the organization's risk appetite and value proposition2.
Ensure that the IT strategy is consistent and coherent with the business strategy, and reflects the organization' s priorities, values, and culture2.
Enhance communication and collaboration between IT and business functions, and foster a shared understanding and commitment to the IT strategy2.
Increase accountability and transparency for IT performance and outcomes, and ensure that IT investments are aligned with the organization's risk appetite and value proposition2.
CISA-KR 문제 567
조직의 재해 복구 계획 프로세스의 전반적인 효과성을 평가할 때, 정보 시스템 감사자가 검증해야 할 가장 중요한 사항은 다음 중 무엇입니까?
정답: D
The overall effectiveness of an organization's disaster recovery planning process depends on how well the plan reflects the current and future needs and risks of the organization, and how well the plan is tested, communicated, and maintained. Among the four options given, the most important one for the IS auditor to verify is that management reviews and updates the plan annually or as changes occur.
A disaster recovery plan is not a static document that can be created once and forgotten. It is a dynamic and evolving process that requires regular review and update to ensure that it remains relevant, accurate, and effective. A disaster recovery plan should be reviewed and updated at least annually, or whenever there are significant changes in the organization's structure, operations, environment, or regulations. These changes could affect the business impact analysis, risk assessment, recovery objectives, recovery strategies, roles and responsibilities, or resources of the disaster recovery plan. If the plan is not updated to reflect these changes, it could become obsolete, incomplete, or inconsistent, and fail to meet the organization's recovery needs or expectations.
The other three options are not as important as reviewing and updating the plan, although they may also contribute to the effectiveness of the disaster recovery planning process. Contracting with a third party for warm site services is a possible recovery strategy that involves using a partially equipped facility that can be quickly activated in case of a disaster. However, this strategy may not be suitable or sufficient for every organization or scenario, and it does not guarantee the success of the disaster recovery plan. Scheduling an annual tabletop exercise is a good practice that involves simulating a disaster scenario and testing the plan in a hypothetical setting. However, this exercisemay not be enough to evaluate the feasibility or readiness of the plan, and it should be complemented by other types of tests, such as walkthroughs, drills, or full-scale exercises. Documenting and distributing a copy of the plan to all personnel is an essential step that ensures that everyone involved in or affected by the plan is aware of their roles and responsibilities, and has access to the relevant information and instructions. However, this step alone does not ensure that the plan is understood or followed by all personnel, and it should be accompanied by proper training, education, and awareness programs.
Therefore, reviewing and updating the plan annually or as changes occur is the best answer.
A disaster recovery plan is not a static document that can be created once and forgotten. It is a dynamic and evolving process that requires regular review and update to ensure that it remains relevant, accurate, and effective. A disaster recovery plan should be reviewed and updated at least annually, or whenever there are significant changes in the organization's structure, operations, environment, or regulations. These changes could affect the business impact analysis, risk assessment, recovery objectives, recovery strategies, roles and responsibilities, or resources of the disaster recovery plan. If the plan is not updated to reflect these changes, it could become obsolete, incomplete, or inconsistent, and fail to meet the organization's recovery needs or expectations.
The other three options are not as important as reviewing and updating the plan, although they may also contribute to the effectiveness of the disaster recovery planning process. Contracting with a third party for warm site services is a possible recovery strategy that involves using a partially equipped facility that can be quickly activated in case of a disaster. However, this strategy may not be suitable or sufficient for every organization or scenario, and it does not guarantee the success of the disaster recovery plan. Scheduling an annual tabletop exercise is a good practice that involves simulating a disaster scenario and testing the plan in a hypothetical setting. However, this exercisemay not be enough to evaluate the feasibility or readiness of the plan, and it should be complemented by other types of tests, such as walkthroughs, drills, or full-scale exercises. Documenting and distributing a copy of the plan to all personnel is an essential step that ensures that everyone involved in or affected by the plan is aware of their roles and responsibilities, and has access to the relevant information and instructions. However, this step alone does not ensure that the plan is understood or followed by all personnel, and it should be accompanied by proper training, education, and awareness programs.
Therefore, reviewing and updating the plan annually or as changes occur is the best answer.
CISA-KR 문제 568
IS 감사 관리자가 조직의 급여 시스템 업그레이드 프로젝트를 담당하는 프로젝트 관리자를 일시적으로 감독하는 업무를 맡았습니다. 감사 부서로 복귀한 후, 감사 관리자는 급여 시스템 구현의 유효성을 검증하는 감사를 수행하라는 요청을 받았습니다. 감사 관리자는 감사 부서에서 유일하게 IT 프로젝트 관리 경험을 가진 직원입니다. 가장 적절한 조치는 무엇일까요?
정답: B
Outsourcing the audit to independent and qualified resources is the best course of action for the IS audit manager who was temporarily tasked with supervising a project manager assigned to the organization's payroll application upgrade. This is because the IS audit manager has a potential conflict of interest and a threat to objectivity and independence, which are essential principles and standards for IS auditors.
According to the ISACA Code of Professional Ethics, IS auditors should maintain objectivity and independence in their professional judgment and avoid any situations that may impair or be presumed to impair their objectivity or independence1. Objectivity is the mental attitude of an IS auditor that allows them to perform their work honestly, impartially, and with integrity, while independence is the freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of an IS auditor to carry out their work in an unbiased manner2.
The IS audit manager who was involved in supervising the payroll application upgrade project may have a self-review threat, which is the risk that an IS auditor will not appropriately evaluate the results of a previous judgment made or service performed by them or their subordinates3. The IS audit manager may also have a familiarity threat, which is the risk that an IS auditor will be influenced by a close relationship with someone involved in the project or by their own personal interests4. These threats may compromise the IS audit manager's objectivity and independence and affect the quality and credibility of the audit.
Therefore, the IS audit manager should disclose their involvement in the project to their senior management and the audit committee and decline to perform or manage the audit. The IS audit manager should also recommend outsourcing the audit to independent and qualified resources who have no connection or interest in the project and who have the necessary skills and experience to conduct a reliable and effective audit.
The other options are not the best course of action for the IS audit manager.
Transferring the assignment to a different audit manager despite lack of IT project management experience is not the best course of action because it may result in a low-quality audit that does not meet the expectations and standards of the stakeholders. IT project management experience is essential for auditing an IT project, as it requires knowledge of project management methodologies, tools, techniques, risks, and best practices. An audit manager who lacks IT project management experience may not be able to plan, execute, report, and follow up on the audit effectively and efficiently.
Managing the audit since there is no one else with the appropriate experience is not the best course of action because it violates the ethical principles and standards of objectivity and independence for IS auditors.
Managing the audit would create a conflict of interest and a threat to objectivity and independence for the IS audit manager, as they would be reviewing their own work or that of their subordinate. Managing the audit would also undermine the credibility and reliability of the audit results and recommendations, as they may be biased or influenced by personal or professional relationships or interests.
Having a senior IS auditor manage the project with the IS audit manager performing final review is not the best course of action because it still involves the IS audit manager in the audit process, which poses a conflict of interest and a threat to objectivity and independence. Performing final review would require the IS audit manager to evaluate and approve the work done by the senior IS auditor, which may be affected by their previous involvement in or knowledge of the project. Performing final review would also expose theIS audit manager to undue pressure or influence from management or other stakeholders who may have expectations or preferences regarding the audit outcome.
According to the ISACA Code of Professional Ethics, IS auditors should maintain objectivity and independence in their professional judgment and avoid any situations that may impair or be presumed to impair their objectivity or independence1. Objectivity is the mental attitude of an IS auditor that allows them to perform their work honestly, impartially, and with integrity, while independence is the freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of an IS auditor to carry out their work in an unbiased manner2.
The IS audit manager who was involved in supervising the payroll application upgrade project may have a self-review threat, which is the risk that an IS auditor will not appropriately evaluate the results of a previous judgment made or service performed by them or their subordinates3. The IS audit manager may also have a familiarity threat, which is the risk that an IS auditor will be influenced by a close relationship with someone involved in the project or by their own personal interests4. These threats may compromise the IS audit manager's objectivity and independence and affect the quality and credibility of the audit.
Therefore, the IS audit manager should disclose their involvement in the project to their senior management and the audit committee and decline to perform or manage the audit. The IS audit manager should also recommend outsourcing the audit to independent and qualified resources who have no connection or interest in the project and who have the necessary skills and experience to conduct a reliable and effective audit.
The other options are not the best course of action for the IS audit manager.
Transferring the assignment to a different audit manager despite lack of IT project management experience is not the best course of action because it may result in a low-quality audit that does not meet the expectations and standards of the stakeholders. IT project management experience is essential for auditing an IT project, as it requires knowledge of project management methodologies, tools, techniques, risks, and best practices. An audit manager who lacks IT project management experience may not be able to plan, execute, report, and follow up on the audit effectively and efficiently.
Managing the audit since there is no one else with the appropriate experience is not the best course of action because it violates the ethical principles and standards of objectivity and independence for IS auditors.
Managing the audit would create a conflict of interest and a threat to objectivity and independence for the IS audit manager, as they would be reviewing their own work or that of their subordinate. Managing the audit would also undermine the credibility and reliability of the audit results and recommendations, as they may be biased or influenced by personal or professional relationships or interests.
Having a senior IS auditor manage the project with the IS audit manager performing final review is not the best course of action because it still involves the IS audit manager in the audit process, which poses a conflict of interest and a threat to objectivity and independence. Performing final review would require the IS audit manager to evaluate and approve the work done by the senior IS auditor, which may be affected by their previous involvement in or knowledge of the project. Performing final review would also expose theIS audit manager to undue pressure or influence from management or other stakeholders who may have expectations or preferences regarding the audit outcome.
CISA-KR 문제 569
다음 중 조직에서 데이터 분류 정책을 시행할 때 문서 소유자의 역할을 가장 잘 설명하는 것은 무엇입니까?
정답: A
The role of a document owner when implementing a data classification policy in an organization is to classify documents to correctly reflect the level of sensitivity of information they contain. A document owner is the person who is ultimately responsible for the creation, maintenance, and protection of a document, usually a member of senior management or a business unit1. A data classification policy is a plan that defines how the organization categorizesits data based on its value, risk, and regulatory requirements, and how it handles and secures each data category2.
According to the data classification policy template by Netwrix3, one of the roles and responsibilities of the document owner is to assign data classification labels based on the data's potential impact level. Data classification labels are tags or markings that indicate the sensitivity level of the data, such as public, internal, confidential, or restricted. The document owner should apply the data classification labels to the documents that contain the data, either manually or automatically, using tools and methods such as metadata, watermarks, headers, footers, or encryption. The document owner should also review and update the data classification labels periodically or whenever there is a change in the data's sensitivity level.
By classifying documents to correctly reflect the level of sensitivity of information they contain, the document owner can help to ensure that the documents are handled in accordance with the data classification policy.
This means that the documents are stored, accessed, shared, transmitted, and disposed of in a secure and appropriate manner, based on the rules and controls defined for each data category. This can also help to prevent data loss, leakage, or breach incidents that may cause harm or damage to the organization or its stakeholders.
Therefore, option A is the correct answer.
References:
Data Classification Policy: Definition, Examples, and Free Template2
Data Classification Policy Template - Netwrix3
Data Classification and Handling Policy - University of Hull1
According to the data classification policy template by Netwrix3, one of the roles and responsibilities of the document owner is to assign data classification labels based on the data's potential impact level. Data classification labels are tags or markings that indicate the sensitivity level of the data, such as public, internal, confidential, or restricted. The document owner should apply the data classification labels to the documents that contain the data, either manually or automatically, using tools and methods such as metadata, watermarks, headers, footers, or encryption. The document owner should also review and update the data classification labels periodically or whenever there is a change in the data's sensitivity level.
By classifying documents to correctly reflect the level of sensitivity of information they contain, the document owner can help to ensure that the documents are handled in accordance with the data classification policy.
This means that the documents are stored, accessed, shared, transmitted, and disposed of in a secure and appropriate manner, based on the rules and controls defined for each data category. This can also help to prevent data loss, leakage, or breach incidents that may cause harm or damage to the organization or its stakeholders.
Therefore, option A is the correct answer.
References:
Data Classification Policy: Definition, Examples, and Free Template2
Data Classification Policy Template - Netwrix3
Data Classification and Handling Policy - University of Hull1
CISA-KR 문제 570
시청자 수가 많을 것으로 예상되는 라이브 스트리밍 기간 동안 스트리밍 사이트가 서비스를 계속 제공할 수 있는지 확인하는 가장 좋은 방법은 다음 중 무엇입니까?
정답: B
프리미엄 번들
DumpTop 에서 공유하는 최신 CISA-KR 시험 덤프는 CISA-KR 시험패스를 도와드릴수 있습니다! DumpTop 은 최근 업데이트된 CISA-KR 시험자료를 제공해드립니다. DumpTop CISA-KR 덤프도 시험문제 변경에 따라 업데이트되었으며 오답도 수정되었습니다. DumpTop CISA-KR 덤프 최신버전을 공유받아보세요.
(1562 Q&As 덤프, 30%OFF할인코드: KrDump)
- 다른 버전
- 208ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-08-15.q712
- 1823ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-05-06.q261
- 3165ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-03-16.q665
- 4558ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-03-07.q651
- 9324ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-04-07.q633
- 4478ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-04-03.q628
- 3720ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-04-02.q544
- 4253ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-03-31.q534
- 5394ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-03-28.q617
- 3250ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-03-19.q581
- 4053ISACA.CISA-KR.v2025-03-03.q807
- 5218ISACA.CISA-KR.v2024-02-07.q421
- 2871ISACA.CISA-KR.v2024-01-31.q392
- 5388ISACA.CISA-KR.v2023-10-24.q329
- 5229ISACA.CISA-KR.v2023-07-31.q266
- 3228ISACA.CISA-KR.v2023-06-23.q324
- 최근 업로드
- 208ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-08-15.q712
- 155Microsoft.MS-700-KR.v2026-08-15.q203
- 126Microsoft.AZ-305-KR.v2026-08-14.q177
- 186Microsoft.DP-900-KR.v2026-08-13.q130
- 279Microsoft.PL-600.v2026-08-11.q206
- 218Microsoft.DP-100.v2026-08-11.q160
- 187Oracle.1Z0-1048-25.v2026-08-11.q68
- 159ISQI.CTAL-TAE.v2026-08-11.q37
- 200ServiceNow.CIS-HR.v2026-08-11.q84
- 275Salesforce.Plat-Arch-201.v2026-08-10.q101
[×]
PDF 파일 다운로드
메일 주소를 입력하시고 다운로드 하세요. ISACA.CISA-KR.v2026-05-16.q709 모의시험 시험자료를 다운 받으세요.